In this section, our researchers in Afghanistan, Bangladesh, India, Nepal, Pakistan and Sri Lanka review major news developments between 1st July and 30th September, 2021, that have impacted or have the potential to impact the lives of South Asia's minorities.
The COVID-19 situation: Since July 2021, Sri Lanka witnessed a crippling spike in COVID-19 cases, peaking at around 4,500 cases and 200 deaths a day at the end of August. At the end of September, the infection caseload seemed to come relatively under control in each country, including in Sri Lanka. At the time of writing, even as health authorities scrambled to prepare for fresh and potentially more devastating waves of the pandemic, the vast majority of the population in each country – with the exception of Sri Lanka – remained yet to be fully vaccinated.
Country | Total confirmed COVID-19 cases* | Total officially attributed COVID-19 deaths* | % of population that is fully vaccinated against COVID-19^ |
Afghanistan | 155,191 | 7,206 | 1.1 |
Bangladesh | 1,555,911 | 27,510 | 10.2 |
India | 33,765,488 | 448,372 | 17.2 |
Nepal | 795,061 | 11,135 | 21.6 |
Pakistan | 1,245,127 | 27,729 | 13.2 |
Sri Lanka | 519,377 | 12,964 | 53.5 |
Amid the pandemic, South Asia’s minorities continued to face targeting. In Afghanistan, the Taliban Islamic fundamentalist group toppled the democratic government and re-established the country as an Islamic emirate, upending the lives of women, ethnic and religious minorities. In Bangladesh, Hindus faced the worst wave of communal violence in years. In India, Christians and Dalits and particularly Muslims, faced both state targeting and vigilante violence, including a burgeoning trend of livelihoods coming under attack. In Nepal, Dalits continue to face violence and social discrimination. In Pakistan, Christians, Hindus, Shias and the Ahmadiyya faced violent attacks. And in Sri Lanka, amid a general erosion of freedoms against the backdrop of the COVID-19 pandemic, Tamils and Muslims continued to face state targeting.
Click the links below for more detailed reporting of major minority-related developments in each country.
The period under review has been cataclysmic for Afghans, overall, and particularly for women and ethno-religious minorities. After a brutal three-and-a-half month-long offensive that coincided with the withdrawal of American troops from the country, the Islamic fundamentalist group, Taliban, finally re-established control over Afghanistan, immediately rechristening it as an Islamic Emirate. The campaign came to a crescendo on 15th August when – after capturing almost all major cities and provincial capitals in a final, ten day-long push – the national capital Kabul fell under Taliban control again, 20 years after it had been driven out.
While the return of the Taliban has upended the lives of the entire population of Afghanistan, it has had grave implications for Afghanistan’s ethnic, religious and gender minorities, particularly its 20 million women, who now face near-total erasure from public life and spaces. Even as the country at large struggles through a humanitarian crisis that is still unfolding and continues to be marked by crippling food and medicine shortages amid a stalled economy, the Taliban has wasted no time in rolling back the hard-won gains of the past two decades, including the most basic rights and freedom. And despite its promises to govern inclusively and its ostensible attempts to present itself as a moderate force, the Taliban has gone about ruthlessly crushing dissent and carrying out summary executions and other atrocities that UN experts say may amount to war crimes and crimes against humanity.
Women:
As during its previous reign, the Taliban’s strict interpretation of Islamic law has relegated Afghanistan’s women back to being second-class citizens with limited rights.
A Human Rights Watch report detailed the Taliban's widespread and systematic abuses against women and girls in the city of Herat, which fell under Taliban control on 12th August, 2021. The report detailed how women’s life as they knew it 'vanished overnight', with the Taliban going door-to-door in search of high-profile women, causing many to flee the country; denying women the basic freedoms of movement and peaceful assembly outside their homes unless accompanied by a male relative; imposing strict dress codes; severely curtailing their access to employment and education; and inflicting severe mental distress.
After negotiations between Herat’s women's representatives and the Taliban on the question of rights ended fruitlessly, a public protest organised by women, on 7th September, ended with Taliban fighters firing indiscriminately and killing two men, before banning protests nationwide unless they obtain prior government permission.
The general trend of women being systematically targeted and side-lined from public life – and of women’s dissent being ruthlessly crushed – held true in other parts of the country as well.
Most women have also been effectively banned from employment, now restricted only to the health and education sectors, apparently for security reasons, an excuse the Taliban had used during their previous reign to confine women to their homes. The Taliban-appointed mayor of Kabul announced that the only jobs women are now eligible to do for the government are those that are not ‘a man’s job’ – such as cleaning public female bathrooms.
Across the country, businesses owned and staffed by women have remained closed.
Video: A number of women rights activists and reporters protested for a second day in Kabul on Saturday, and said the protest turned violent as Taliban forces did not allow the protesters to march toward the Presidential Palace. #TOLOnews pic.twitter.com/X2HJpeALvA
— TOLOnews (@TOLOnews) September 4, 2021
Ethnic minorities:
Taliban have upended the ethnic balance sought to be maintained by previous governments. Members of marginalised ethnic groups are increasingly being sidelined from governance and in public participation. A few male members from Afghanistan’s Tajik, Uzbek and Hazara ethnic minority communities have been added by Taliban to its interim cabinet, albeit to lower positions in ministries with relatively limited importance. All key portfolios in the cabinet are occupied by Pashtuns. Alongside, the country’s ethnic minorities, who were heavily persecuted and subject to several mass killings during the Taliban’s previous reign – in addition to countless bombings and targeted killings over the past two decades – have come under renewed attack.
An Amnesty International investigation found that at least nine Shia Hazara men were tortured and brutally murdered by the Taliban in Ghazni province, in a two-day killing spree shortly after it took control of the province in July 2021. Amnesty noted that these killings likely represent only a tiny fraction of the total death toll inflicted by the Taliban, amid an expansive communications blackout.
Yet another massacre of Hazaras was uncovered by Amnesty in Daykundi province in late-August, where Taliban fighters were reported to have executed 11 former Afghan National Army soldiers. Two civilians including a 17-year-old girl were also reported to have been killed, apparently in the crossfire when Taliban forces targeted soldiers attempting to flee the location.
Separately, more than 700 Hazara farmer families in central Afghanistan were reported to have been driven out of their homes by the Taliban in Uruzgan province, apparently to favour Pashtun Taliban members who wanted to seize the land and crops. Similar mass evictions of Shia-Hazaras were also reported from Mazar-i-Sharif in Baikh province, and around 3,000 non-Hazara Shias were reported to have been driven out of their homes in Kandahar city.
Religious minorities:
Following assurances from senior Taliban leaders, dozens of Hindus and Sikhs who had sought shelter at a gurdwara (Sikh place of worship) in Kabul were reported to have returned to their hometowns and reopened their businesses. Many others – including some parliamentarians – fled to India, which announced that it would prioritise Hindus and Sikhs in its evacuation effort out of the country.
Afghanistan is now estimated to have only around 250 Sikhs and Hindus remaining.
General attacks on freedoms:
Despite its proclaimed amnesty for all Afghans who had served the previous government and its NATO-supported armed forces, there were numerous reports of Taliban forces going door-to-door in search of ‘collaborators’. The UN — and the interim defence minister of the Taliban regime — acknowledged that there had been several ‘revenge killings’ by Taliban fighters.
Some documented instances of such atrocities committed by the Taliban during the period under review, in addition to incidents already mentioned above, include:
The chief enforcer of the Taliban's interpretation of Islamic law during its previous reign announced that brutal legal punishments would return to Afghanistan, remarking that measures such as amputation of arms are 'very necessary for security'. He added that there would be ‘no more torture’.
A day after the announcement, several men in Herat who the Taliban alleged were criminals were shot dead and their bodies hung in public squares across the city, as a warning to other potential criminals. Similar reports were heard from across the country.
During the period under review, Bangladesh’s Hindu community faced the worst bout of communal violence in years after a Facebook post triggered violence across the country. The attacks were preceded by other, comparatively smaller instances of Hindu faith symbols being targeted ahead of the Hindu Durga Puja festival season.
Separately and also during the period under review, some Bangladeshi Hindu organisations resisted efforts by civil society to reform the Hindu inheritance law and make it more equitable for women.
Hindus:
Violent targeting:
In October 2021, Bangladesh witnessed its worst bout of communal violence in years, with Hindu temples, dwellings and gatherings across the country facing a series of coordinated and violent mob attacks. The Guardian reported that the attacks – which were reported from at least 22 of the country’s 64 districts – resulted in at least 7 confirmed deaths and hundreds of injuries, as of 16 October. The violence, which coincided with the Hindu Durga Puja festival, was marked by least 17 temples being targeted. Dozens of Hindu homes were reported to have been burned down in Rangpur.
Bangladesh’s Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina too condemned the attacks, reassured the country’s Hindus and vowed to ‘hunt down and punish’ those responsible, while also hinting that the attacks may have been influenced by developments in neighbouring India.
Attacks on Hindus in Bangladesh are often precipitated by attacks on Muslims in India, and vice-versa. In March 2021, a visit to the country by Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi had triggered protests and another round of anti-Hindu violence, leaving at least a dozen people dead.
The immediate spark for the latest spate of attacks was reportedly a provocative social media post that purported to show Islam’s holy Quran being disrespected at a Hindu temple in Bangladesh’s Cumilla city. In 2016, hundreds of Hindu homes across Bangladesh were burned down over similar outrage over a fake Facebook post.
Video: A number of women rights activists and reporters protested for a second day in Kabul on Saturday, and said the protest turned violent as Taliban forces did not allow the protesters to march toward the Presidential Palace. #TOLOnews pic.twitter.com/X2HJpeALvA
— TOLOnews (@TOLOnews) September 4, 2021
Even before the attacks in October, there were two major instances of Hindu religious places in Bangladesh coming under attack:
On 7th August, four Hindu temples, at least Hindu religious idols, six shops, and two homes belonging to local Hindus in Khulna district (Shiali village, Rupsha sub-district) came under attack by vandals. The attacks reportedly took place following a dispute between local Hindus and Muslims the previous day. Police have arrested 10 people in a case filed in connection with the attacks.
Oh 21st September, unidentified miscreants vandalised Hindu idols that were being constructed ahead of the upcoming Durga Puja Hindu festival, in Kushtia town. Local artisans had left the idols to dry the previous night after coating them with clay. Locals say the attack took place at a temporary temple porch that is built in the area every year ahead of Durga Puja.
Legal and policy developments:
The Hindu Paribarik Ain Poribartan Protirodh Committee (HPAPPC), a platform of 20 Hindu community groups, protested rights activists’ demands to reform the existing Hindu family law and to ensure equal property rights for women. HPAPPC insisted that the issue be resolved through religious scriptures, and urged the government not to adopt the bill in Parliament. Angela Gomez and Shaheen Anam, two eminent human rights activists, were sued for their alleged role in spearheading the reform, even though the draft law formation committee denied that the activists were involved.
Bangladesh’s Prime Minister had called for the formulation of a Hindu inheritance law in 2016, following which a citizens’ group – the Hindu Ain Pronoyon e Nagorik Udyog Coalition – had formulated a draft law, which aimed to ensure equal right of Hindu citizens to the property of their parents.
During the period under review, against a backdrop of increasingly toxic anti-minority hate and incitement, India’s Muslims, Christians and other caste and tribal minorities faced a spate of hate crimes and other forms of violent targeting by non-state actors linked to the ruling Hindu nationalist regime led by the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP). At the same time, the BJP-led national government and BJP-led governments in several states stepped up their targeting of minorities, using extrajudicial killings, arbitrary detentions and torture, in addition to discriminatory laws, procedures, policies and other state actions.
Religious Minorities:
Muslims:
State Violence:
Killings:
Police forces in BJP-ruled Assam shot dead three Muslims including a 12-year-old boy during an eviction drive in Darrang district. At least 20 people were reported injured. Chief Minister Himanta Biswa Sarma blamed two Islamic organisations of orchestrating the violence, and called on the federal government to ban them. (also see sub-section on Discriminatory Laws, Procedures, Policies and Actions)
#VIDEO | #Assam eviction drive turns ugly, cameraman tramples body of a man killed in #Sipajhar firing. @assampolice @DGPAssamPolice @gpsinghips @AssamCid @mygovassam #SipajharEviction #Assampolice pic.twitter.com/tVb23l2ggo
— G Plus (@guwahatiplus) September 24, 2021
In May 2021, Sarma’s government had begun a campaign of extra-judicial killings, ostensibly aimed at curbing crime. As of 5th September, at least 23 alleged criminals had been shot dead in the state, in addition to 38 who were injured. A partial list of victims, from July, revealed that the targets of the campaign have disproportionately been Muslims.
The extra-judicial killing campaign in Assam is similar to an ongoing campaign in BJP-ruled Uttar Pradesh (UP), which has witnessed 150 such killings since March 2017. Of these, a disproportionate number (37%, compared to their population share of 19%) have been of Muslims.
A family from Anantnag in Muslim-majority Kashmir alleged that their son was killed by Indian government forces in a staged gunfight. Police claim that the victim was an armed militant. Since July 2020, there have been at least four separate instances of Kashmiri families alleging such extra-judicial killings.
While India has claimed a reduction in militancy in Kashmir, a police statement on 24th August revealed that government forces had killed 102 alleged militants in the region so far this year. Since then, SAC researchers have tracked eight more such killings of alleged militants. Since July 2021, at least two civilians – in Tral and Kulgam – and eight armed forces personnel have been killed by alleged militants. A local BJP leader and his wife were also killed. In early October, after the period under review, Kashmir witnessed a fresh surge of civilian killings by militants, aimed at Hindus and Sikhs.
Custodial torture and death:
In Jharkhand’s Jamshedpur district, two Muslim men alleged that they were tortured and forced to have sex with each other inside a police station.
Allegations of custodial torture were also made by two Muslim men arrested in connection with the February 2020 anti-Muslim violence in North-East Delhi. The men, who secured bail in June 2021 after 15 months in custody, are accused of murdering a fellow Muslim. The victims of the February 2020 violence, which many have described as a pogrom perpetrated by Hindu extremists with the help of police, were overwhelmingly and disproportionately Muslims. Delhi Police’s biased post-violence investigation, which has targeted Muslims, has been slammed by international observers and by several courts.
In a separate case, also in North-East Delhi, a disabled Muslim woman who was questioned in connection with a petty scuffle alleged that she was assaulted by male police officers.
Recently released government data revealed that India witnessed 76 custodial deaths in 2020. While a further demographic breakdown is not available, the victims of custodial torture and death in India are usually overwhelmingly members of marginalised communities – including religious, caste and tribal minorities.
India remains one of only a handful of countries yet to ratify the UN Convention Against Torture.
Discriminatory laws, procedures, policies and state actions:
In Kashmir, the family of veteran separatist leader Syed Ali Shah Geelani, who died of natural causes while under house arrest, alleged that his body was snatched by government forces and forcibly buried. Geelani’s family members were later booked under anti-terror charges, in a move that was condemned by several international human rights bodies. Geelani’s death was also marked by the imposition of a near-total communications blackout, heavy deployment of government forces, and violent protests. Congregational Friday prayers were banned at mosques in Srinagar for four straight weeks.
Less than two weeks before Geelani’s death, scores of Shia Muslims participating in annual Muharram processions in Srinagar were detained after being assaulted by government forces with batons, tear gas shells and birdshot ‘pellet’ guns. At least one mourner was reported to have been partially blinded, and many were booked under anti-terror charges. Journalists documenting the procession were also reported to have been assaulted.
The violence in Srinagar was in stark contrast to the state security provided to Kashmiri Hindus who participated in processions during a Hindu festival.
Also in Kashmir, a new order by the unelected administration stipulated that government employees can now be terminated if their family members are found to have links to militants. At least 17 Jammu & Kashmir (J&K) government employees have been sacked so far this year for alleged links to militants.
The Assam government continued to conduct a series of major eviction drives in Darrang district’s Dhalpur village, populated mostly by Bengali-origin Muslims. Two eviction drives – one in June, and the second on 20th September – resulted in around 850 Muslim families being rendered homeless. A third eviction drive resulted in the killing of three Muslims (see section on Killings). The Assam government ostensibly wants to reclaim the land for a farming project.
‘Indigenous’ ethnonationalists in Assam have, for decades, sought to drive Bengali-speakers of all faiths out of the state. The BJP has, in recent years, sought to communalise this conflict, and has solely targeted Bengali-speaking Muslims, by using the contentious National Register of Citizens (NRC) exercise, which has left 1.9 million Assam residents on the brink of statelessness, and the ‘fundamentally discriminatory’ Citizenship (Amendment) Act (CAA), which could ensure that non-Muslims would be protected from the effects of exclusion from the NRC. The ongoing eviction drive is seen as part of this broader effort to target Bengali-origin Muslims.
During the period under review, Assam also enacted a more stringent version of its cattle protection law, which experts warn could further embolden violent attacks against Muslims by Hindu vigilantes, as has been the norm in BJP-ruled states with similar laws.
Escalating its targeting of Muslims, police forces in Uttar Pradesh – led by Chief Minister and hardline Hindu monk ‘Yogi’ Adityanath – arrested several Muslims on charges that locals say are frivolous and aimed with a view of religious polarisation ahead of upcoming state elections. A prominent Islamic scholar was arrested for allegedly running a religious conversion syndicate, along with 10 others. In another case, five Muslim men from mostly destitute families were arrested on terror charges. Local CSOs have found glaring loopholes in the police’s version.
Adityanath also announced his intention to impose a total ban on the sale of meat and liquor in Mathura, city considered holy by many Hindus, but is also home to 60,000 (17%) Muslims, who dominate the meat trade. Adityanath’s announcement has already empowered vigilante attacks against Muslims in Mathura. (see section on Hate, Incitement and Violence by Non-State Actors)
Also in UP, a local court acquitted 20 Hindus accused of violence during the anti-Muslim riots in Muzaffarnagar in 2013, which had left 62 dead – including 42 Muslims – and more than 50,000 Muslims displaced. Since the Adityanath-led government assumed power in the state in 2017, dozens of Hindus accused of violence during the riots, including senior BJP leaders, have either been discharged or acquitted.
Separately, UP’s state High Court suggested declaring the cow India’s national animal, and making cow protection – which has resulted in the deaths of scores of Muslims and ‘lower-caste’ Dalits across the country over the past decade – a fundamental right.
Hate, incitement, violence and other forms of targeting:
India also witnessed several widely reported instances of hate speech and open incitement to violence against Muslims, including by actors closely linked to the BJP.
In national capital Delhi, a rally organised by a BJP leader was marked by the chanting of several violent anti-Muslim slogans, and the distribution of flyers calling for the annihilation of Islam. Almost all the men arrested in connection with the event – all of whom have now secured bail – are followers of extremist Hindu priest Yati Narsinghanand, who had openly called for the genocide of Muslims in the lead-up to the February 2020 anti-Muslim violence in Delhi. During the period under review, Narsinghanand continued to call on Hindus to arm themselves and fight against Islam.
On Sunday, anti-Muslim slogans were raised and provocative speeches were made at a rally called by BJP leader Ashwini Upadhyay at Jantar Mantar.
— newslaundry (@newslaundry) August 10, 2021
Who raised these slogans? Watch @shivangi441's report for @nlhindi. pic.twitter.com/R0jtJldg6J
Against this backdrop of increased hate, India’s Muslims continued to face violent attacks from non-state actors ideologically aligned to the Hindu nationalist ruling regime:
Mob lynching deaths of Muslims by Hindus were reported from Uttar Pradesh’s Shamli district (a 17-year old boy), Bihar’s Madhepura (a 65-year-old man) and Nawada (a 25-year-old man) districts, and Manipur’s Thoubal district (a man of unknown age). All three states are governed by the BJP or its allies.
In Karnataka’s Belagavi district, a 24-year-old Muslim man was found beheaded, allegedly by members of a right-wing Hindu group at the behest of the victim’s Hindu girlfriend’s family. Other murders of Muslims – not amounting to lynching – were also reported from UP’s Meerut (two children aged 13 and 14) and Jaunpur (a 19-year-old political worker) districts. In Rajasthan’s Alwar district, a 16-year-old Muslim boy was killed after being run over by a car driven by cow vigilantes who were apparently chasing cow smugglers.
India also witnessed several instances of Muslim livelihoods being targeted by Hindu extremists using intimidation and, on many occasions, physical violence. The perpetrators recorded and published videos of several such attacks.
In Indore in BJP-ruled Madhya Pradesh (MP), a Muslim bangle seller was assaulted for – according to a justification provided by the state’s Home Minister – using a Hindu name and selling his goods in a Hindu locality. The victim was later arrested on charges of molestation. Activists had organised protests in his favour were also reported to have been either arrested or to be facing legal exile. In MP’s Dewas district, a Muslim street vendor was assaulted for selling eatables in a Hindu-dominated area. In MP’s Ujjain district, a Muslim scrap-dealer was pictured being forced to chant Hindu religious slogans before being made to leave the village. In Khargone, also in MP, after an alleged instance of beef recovery, extremist Hindu outfits chanted genocidal slogans and attacked many Muslim-owned shops, injuring many.
Several similar incidents were also reported from BJP-ruled Uttar Pradesh (UP). Muslim shopkeepers in Muzaffarnagar were pictured being harassed ahead of a Hindu festival in August. Later, Al Jazeera reported that Hindu extremists have been issuing similar threats across the state ahead of the upcoming Hindu festive season in October and November. In two separate incidents from Mathura, Muslim owners of food stalls were pictured being harassed. In Lucknow, a Muslim rickshaw driver was harassed and forced to chant Hindu religious slogans.
There were also several other instances of physical violence against Muslims, not linked to livelihoods. UP witnessed three such incidents: in Mathura, two men were first assaulted by cow vigilantes and then arrested and sent to judicial custody. In Noida, a 62-year-old man was stripped and assaulted by men chanting anti-Muslim slogans. In Kanpur, a Muslim man was pictured being assaulted and forced to chant Hindu religious slogans in front of his daughter.
Instances of physical assault were also reported from Samba (J&K), Damtal (HP), Ajmer (Rajasthan), and Mysore (Karnataka).
Other forms of targeting by non-state actors:
Christians:
India’s Christians too faced targeting from state and non-state actors.
United Christian Forum (UCF), a network of advocacy groups that run a hate crime help line number, documented 152 episodes of anti-Christian targeting during the period under review. According to UCF, only 10 of these incidents ended in a formal case being registered by the police. A total of 716 women, 307 ‘lower caste’ Dalits, and 357 members of indigenous Adivasi tribes were targeted in these incidents. Uttar Pradesh (47) and Chhattisgarh (25) states accounted for the highest number of incidents, while Bihar and Karnataka both witnessed 10 incidents each.
Type of violation | Number of incidents |
Physical assault | 22 |
Sexual assault | 0 |
Social ostracism | 8 |
Arrests and detention | 91 |
Restrictions on religious assembly | 42 |
Intimidation, threats and harassment | 152 |
Only a handful of anti-Christian hate crimes get reported in the English-language news media, such as recent incidents in Bihar’s Gaya district – where a 14-year-old Dalit Christian was killed after he had acid thrown at him by, according to his family, Hindu extremists – and in Chhatisgarh’s Raipur district, where a priest was assaulted inside a police station by Hindu extremists, including at least two members of the BJP’s youth wing.
Caste and tribal minorities:
Recently-released government data for 2020 showed that crimes against Scheduled Castes (‘lower-caste’ Dalits) and Scheduled Tribes (members of indigenous tribes) rose by 9.4% (to 50,291) and 9.3% (to 8,272) compared to the previous year. BJP-ruled Uttar Pradesh (12,714 or 25.2%) recorded the highest number of anti-Dalit crimes, while BJP-ruled Madhya Pradesh (2,401 or 29%) accounted for the highest number of anti-ST crimes.
The data also revealed that at the end of 2020, nearly 20,000 of these cases were yet to reach court.
General attacks on freedoms:
The Indian government also continued its efforts to silence journalists, HRDs and other government critics, using ‘politically motivated allegations’ of financial irregularities and other charges.
With the global pandemic of COVID-19 taking a toll on the lives of millions around the world, Nepal has been hugely impacted, with over ten thousand deaths in total. By end of September 2021, Only a fraction of the total population in the entire country had been vaccinated. The dearth of jabs and problems faced while accessing them has further inflicted collective trauma in the lives of people.
In this time of crisis, all the three key organs of governance are in disarray, while the dignity, freedom and lives of minorities in the country remain at stake. A number of incidents, including violent ones, against them have been perpetrated with no legal remedy in most of the cases.
Dalits:
LGBTIQA+:
Indigenous groups:
Citizenship ordinance:
During the period under review, as Pakistan grappled with its fourth wave of the COVID-19 pandemic, the targeting of its religious minorities continued. In addition to numerous documented cases of religious persecution, there were also important policy developments.
Hindus::
On 4th August, after local courts granted bail to a nine-year-old Hindu boy who had been charged in a blasphemy case, hundreds of Muslims vandalised a Hindu temple in Rahim Yar Khan, Punjab. Although initial reports had suggested that the tensions over the boy had been resolved amicably, a subsequent social media hate campaign against the Hindu community eventually led to the attack, during which a violent mob stormed the temple and smashed idols of Hindu deities housed within it.
Ganesh Temple, village Bhong in Rahim Yar Khan, Punjab has been ravaged.
— Veengas (@VeengasJ) August 4, 2021
Another day, another attack on Hindus in Pakistan. pic.twitter.com/grLlT582XL
After Pakistan’s Supreme Court reprimanded local police for its inaction, 52 of the miscreants involved in the attack, including the main accused, were arrested. By 10th August, the temple had been completely restored and handed back to members of the Hindu community. The expenses incurred for the temple renovation are to be recovered from the rioters.
Another instance of a temple being vandalised and idols of Hindu deities being destroyed was reported from Sanghar district in Sindh on 30th August, ahead of a Hindu festival.
Christians:
In September 2021, a Pentecostal Church in Lahore was attacked by a group of Muslims during Sunday service, leaving many injured, including a pregnant woman and the pastor of the church.
Witnesses alleged that in the days leading up to the attack, women churchgoers and their families had been subjected to harassment and abuse.
The secretary-general of Pakistan’s Minority Rights Commission condemned the incident and noted that despite ‘great efforts’ by the government, incidents and abuses against minorities had increased by 40%.
In another incident reported during the period under review, a Christian pastor was attacked by Muslim men in Hyderabad. The police were reportedly initially hesitant to register a case. The attackers are also accused of harassing the pastor’s wife. After the Christian community protested the incident, a police spokesperson claimed that two suspects – but not the main accused – had been arrested.
In August 2021, a Christian couple in Haripur alleged that their 14-and-a-half year-old daughter had been abducted, forcibly converted to Islam and married to a man connected to a local leader of the ruling Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) party. The parents claimed that they were facing threats and further alleged that police were reluctant to file a formal case about the matter.
While local police claim that the schoolgirl had gotten married at a court and converted to Islam on her own free will, a court had the accused and his father presented before it and sent the girl to a shelter home. The girl told the court that she had converted on her own and wished to continue living with her husband, while her parents insist that she was underage and hence cannot get married under the Child Marriage Restraint Act. The divisional president of PTI’s minority wing also agreed that the girl was underage, and that the Christian community would pursue the case at all possible legal fora.
Analysts have repeatedly noted that Pakistan’s legal system is discriminatory against religious minorities and point to a loophole that girls cannot converted back, as it is prohibited by Islam.
Ahmadiyyas:
Shias:
On 19th August, a Shia Muslim Ashura procession in Bahawalnagar was targeted in a deadly bomb attack, killing at least 3 people and leaving around 50 injured. The attacked, who had lobbed a grenade, was immediately arrest.
Separately, several reports alleged that police cases were registered against the organisers of similar Shia processions in Punjab and Sindh.
Policy developments::
The recently-released findings of Pakistan’s census – completed in 2017 – raised controversy, with representatives of several minority communities alleging that they were significantly undercounted. The findings suggest that the share of religious minorities in the total population shrank minimally, with Muslims now accounting for 96.47% of the population (from 96.27% in 1998), while Hindus account for 1.73%, Christians for 1.27%, Ahmadiyya for 0.09%, Scheduled Caste for 0.41%, and others for 0.02% of the total population.
Christian CSOs alleged, citing church records, that Christians may have been undercounted by at least half a million. Similar undercounting was also noted in the Hindu community, while Sikhs expressed disappointment that they were not given a separate religious column. Ahmadiyya community leaders claimed that they were undercounted as most Ahmadiyya hide their religious identity.
Clerics belonging to all four mainstream Islamic schools of thought – Shia, Barelvi, Deobandi and Ahle Hadith – along with officials of the Council of Islamic Ideology (CII) jointly rejected the Human Right’s proposed draft of the anti-forced conversion law, insisting that no forced conversions of religion are taking place in Pakistan. In September, the CII had conducted a brainstorming session about the proposed bill, and had invited a Barelvi cleric infamous for participating in forced conversions.
The Peoples’ Commission for Minorities Rights, comprising various minority rights activists, endorsed the bill and condemned the political manoeuvring by the religious right.
In October, the Parliamentary Committee convened to address the issue of forced conversions rejected the draft bill.
During the period under review, Sri Lanka grappled with a crippling third wave of COVID-19 fuelled by the Delta variant, registering around 4,000 cases a day at its peak at the end of August – around 33% higher than during the peak of the second wave. The pandemic provided cover for the further general erosion of freedoms in the country, while minority Tamils and Muslims continued to face targeting in various forms.
Tamils:
Lohan Ratwatte, a Member of Parliament and the State Minister for Prison Management & Prisoners’ Rehabiliitation, was reported to entered the Anuradhapura Prison while inebriated with a group of friends, and threatened Tamil prisoners arrested under the Prevention of Terrorism Act (PTA).
Witnesses told Sri Lanka’s Human Rights Commission, which visited the prison after the incident, that the Minister had the prisoners kneel and held a gun to their heads. The Commission was also told that prison authorities were merely going around ensuring security protocols for the minister were in place, and that Rotwatte appeared to have been given a free hand to threaten the Tamil prisoners at gunpoint.
Ratwatte, who has resigned from the Prisons minister portfolio, continues to hold charge of another portfolio. Despite multiple witnesses, he has repeatedly denied that the incident happened. Ratwatte has a history of violent behaviour for which he continues to enjoy impunity, including for the shooting of 10 Muslims – supporters of the Sri Lanka Muslim Congress - during an election in the year 2001.
PTA prisoners are regularly subject to torture and long imprisonment periods without charge or trial. The fact that Ratwatte was not removed from office and continues to hold a ministerial portfolio indicates that continued mistreatment of these prisoners is acceptable.
Two instances of attempted land grabs in the North-Eastern region were blocked due to protests from the Tamil residents of the area. The first occurred in the region of Weli Oya or Manal Aru, and the second in the Vadduvakkal region of Mullaitivu, where occupied land was being surveyed for the establishment of a new defense compound.
Civil society organisations have also raised concerns with the Government Agent of Jaffna requesting displaced people whose private lands are under military occupation for information on these lands. The representatives ask for more time for people to provide information and also look into the extensive information that people have already provided in the hopes of getting their lands back.
Muslims:
The detention of several individuals who were arrested on counts of ‘terrorism’ in the aftermath of the 2019 Easter Sunday bombings and have been languishing in detention centres without trial, was further extended without charges.
Local and international advocacy groups have continued to call for the release of lawyer Hejaaz Hisbullah and poet Ahnaf Jazeem who have also been detained on trumped-up charges of promoting terrorism.
Muslim women continued their decades-long effort to reform the Muslim Marriage and Divorce Act (MMDA).
As discussions around the reforms are at the forefront, Muslim Personal Law Reforms Action Group (MPLRAG) carried out a campaign asking that Muslims women be allowed to sign their marriage certificates, currently not permitted under the law, where only the signature of the bride’s wali (guardian) is required.
Justice Minister Ali Sabry has since announced that steps would be taken to allow Muslims to marry under the Marriage Registration Ordinance, and a committee was appointed to provide recommendations for reforms based on these proposals. The recommendations since made by this committee have yet to be made public, and some Muslim women advocates have also asked for more clarity while also commending the proposals. One key request is that the recommendations of the committee be made public.
There are concerns among the Muslim community around leaked proposals that the quasi-courts that administer the MMDA be abolished, and that the law would be brought under the administration of district courts. Some Muslims believe it necessary because it discriminates against women, while others believe it would not be beneficial to bring the law under an already problematic and regressive institution. Others are skeptical of abolishing the quasi-courts as it would erode the individuality of the community that a personal law brings.
General erosion of freedoms against the backdrop of COVID-19:
Sri Lanka’s parliament approved a state of emergency declared by the president, who said it is needed to control food prices and prevent hoarding amid shortages of some staples. Authorities are now empowered – under the Public Security Ordinance - to seize stocks of staple foods and set their prices, to contain soaring inflation after a steep devaluation of its currency due to a foreign exchange crisis that the government itself was responsible for creating.
The government has denied reports of food shortages, though images and anecdotes from people who were unable to purchase items due to these shortages say otherwise.
Citizen groups raised concerns over the declaration of emergency, due to the near-unchecked power it gives the President.
Soon after the state of emergency was declared, reports emerged of police brutality against Tamils and Muslims in the Eastern Province. These included a journalist who was beaten and detained for not wearing a face mask, two brothers beaten for travelling to a petrol station during a lockdown, and an instance of custodial torture and coerced confession.
There were numerous instances of protests and protesters being targeted by the state:
Teachers and principals from schools and institutions undertook two protests this year, the first to demand an increase in their wages, and the second in opposition to a proposed piece of legislation that would bring a local university even more strictly under military control, with no oversight.
The Kotalawala Defense University (KDU) Bill has been critiqued by politicians, educators and students, and the protestors were rallying against the militarization of education. Protestors in Colombo were beaten by Police and arrested, later released on bail by the Magistrates Court. However, after their release, protestors found themselves being led into Police buses and transported to quarantine centres, despite the court not ordering this. This was one of several instances detailed in previous updates where the pandemic has been used as a cover to stifle dissent. Protest followed as people rallied to speak up against the detention of these protestors, with some teachers refusing to teach online. The Colombo Additional Magistrate opined that Quarantine Law should not overpower people’s constitutionally protected right to expression, right to protest and freedom of speech.
In the aftermath of the protests, the CID and select politicians have been aiming to paint the teachers protests as the reason behind the surging COVID cases at the time. Though their issues remain unresolved, intelligence agencies were reported to have been collecting information about dates and locations of certain demonstrations in a bid to demonise the protests alone for the spread of the virus.
Earlier this year, Sri Lanka’s Secretary to the Ministry of Health issued an order threatening disciplinary action against anyone in the health sector who spoke to the media. The Secretary alleged that this was because they were sharing ‘incorrect health-related information’ and because they were ‘criticising health policies.
When COVID numbers surged, doctors took to social media to speak about the overwhelming situation in the hospitals they were based at – the lack of space for sick patients, the lack of medical equipment and how official numbers didn’t reflect the gravity of the situation.
One of these doctors was Najith Indika, who was then interrogated by the CID for posting on Facebook about the situation at the Avissawella Hospital. State Minister of Health Prof. Channa Jayasumana also went on to criticize Dr. Indika for his comments. The continued intimidation of doctors in this manner distracts from the government’s own incompetence in managing the pandemic.
Sri Lanka was placed in ‘lockdown’ in late August, weeks after several organisations of medical professionals had written to the President and publicized the need for a lockdown to both curb the spread and give the health sector some space to catch up with the overwhelming number of cases, admissions and deaths. Many public health officials suspected that the delay in imposing lockdown had done enough damage by itself.
News reports note that the President gave the order for lockdown after a request to do so came from the Chief Prelates of the Asgiriya and Malwatte Chapters, senior Buddhist monks with significant social and political influence. This was after the President allowed the country’s main Buddhist celebration, the Kandy Esala Perahera, to continue during the critical pandemic period – without spectators, however 5000 artisans participated.
The continuing crisis in the country was coupled with the reshuffle and resignation of several qualified medical professionals from their roles in pandemic management, as they felt medical expertise and public health was not being prioritized in the response.
Health Minister Dr. Sudarshani Fernandopulle, who had previously noted to media her worries that the government wasn’t taking care of the people, and that the people would need to protect themselves. Soon after, a Cabinet reshuffle saw Keheliya Rambukwella appointed Health Minister.
Dr. Ananda Wijewickrema and Dr. Asoka Gunaratne, both recognized medical specialists, resigned from the COVID Technical Committee as they felt the decisions it was taking were not informed by medical factors.
Criticism at international fora:
In her oral report to the Human Rights Council (HRC), the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights Michele Bachelet noted the issue of militarization, the de-radicalisation gazette, the impunity for military officials, the lack of progress in investigating the Easter Bombings, threats towards human rights defenders among many other concerns with regard to the situation in Sri Lanka.
President Rajapaksa, speaking at the General Assembly, reportedly raised issues that have since drawn criticism, considering his government’s record of mismanaging these same factors. In addition, Rajapaksa also met with Secretary General Antonio Guterres, where he claimed the country was ready to work closely with the United Nations (UN), a far cry from the government’s dismissive attitude towards the HRC resolution and any UN recommendations for the country.
The South Asia Collective
thesouthasiacollective.org | sac@thesouthasiacollective.org